TheJobsMarket
Pay by Occupation

Which Occupations Have the Widest Pay Spread

In some occupations almost everyone earns roughly the same. In others the top tenth earns three times the bottom. Which one you are in changes what you should do.

Short answer

The ratio between the 90th and 10th percentile is the cleanest measure of how much room an occupation has. Wide-spread occupations reward specialization, industry choice and employer size heavily; narrow-spread occupations, often those with formal scales or collective agreements, reward them barely at all. The ratio tells you whether to climb where you are or move.

The widest and the narrowest

Among occupations employing fifty thousand or more people, personal financial advisors have the widest published spread: 7.11 times from $50,190 at the tenth percentile to $357,020 at the ninetieth. Chief executives follow at 6.71 times, then two physician categories above six.

At the other end, farmworkers and laborers run 1.39 times, from $32,900 to $45,690. Tellers 1.45 times. Food processing workers 1.49.

The median occupation sits at 2.22 times, so both ends are a long way from typical.

Four things that produce a wide spread

Pay tied to production. Commission, fees or a share of what you bring in. This is the single biggest cause and it explains the top of the list.

Several real jobs under one code. Physician categories cover specialties that pay very differently, so part of the spread is definitional rather than about individuals.

Specialization that takes years. Where deep expertise is scarce and valuable, the people who have it separate from the people who do not.

Employer type and industry margin. The same work priced differently by who buys it.

What a narrow spread is telling you

That the work is standardized and people are close substitutes. Two competent people produce nearly the same output, so there is little for an employer to pay a premium for.

That is not a criticism of the work. It is a description of how progression happens: not by getting better at the same job, but by moving to a different one. In a 1.39-times occupation, a decade of excellence has a small ceiling.

Why this changes your strategy completely

In a wide occupation, staying and specializing is a real path. The distance between the median and the seventy-fifth is worth chasing, and it is reachable through the work itself.

In a narrow one, the highest-value move is usually sideways or up into a different occupation — often a supervisory or adjacent technical role — because that is where the next range begins.

Spread and level are independent

Wide does not mean well paid. An occupation can have a low median and a huge range, which describes a field where a minority does very well and most do not — real estate agents at a $52,830 median with a mean of $69,510 are the clearest example.

Equally, narrow does not mean badly paid. Some well-compensated occupations have tight bands because the work is standardized and the employers are large and consistent.

Calculating it for your own occupation

Divide the ninetieth percentile by the tenth. Under about 1.8 is narrow, around 2.2 is typical, above 3 is wide. Then do the same for your metro, because the local shape can differ from the national one.

That single ratio tells you more about your prospects inside the job than the median does, and almost nobody computes it.

Using it in a negotiation

In a wide occupation, the case for a large increase is that you are doing the things that define the upper half — and the published spread proves those things are paid for.

In a narrow one, that argument is weak because the data shows the employer that almost nobody in the occupation earns much more than the median. There the stronger move is a title change or a scope change, which moves you to a different table.

The spread also tells you how to read an offer

In a narrow occupation, an offer near the median is close to the best available and there is little room to argue. In a wide one, the same relative position leaves a great deal on the table, because the distance to the seventy-fifth is substantial.

So the first thing to check about an offer is not the number but the shape of the occupation it sits in. That determines whether the conversation is worth having at all, and how much you can reasonably ask for.

Common questions

What is a typical spread ratio?

Around two to two and a half for many occupations — the top tenth earning roughly twice the bottom tenth. Above three is very wide; near one and a half is unusually compressed.

Is a wide spread good or bad?

Neither. It means the choices you make about industry, specialization and employer are worth a lot. A narrow spread means they are worth little and predictability is higher.

What should I do in a narrow occupation?

Location, seniority within the scale, and moving to an adjacent occupation are the levers that remain. The last is more often the right answer than people expect.

How do I calculate the ratio myself?

Divide the 90th percentile by the 10th, taken from the same table for the same area. Mixing a national figure with a local one produces a meaningless number.

Does a wide spread mean I can reach the top?

It means the room exists, not that tenure will get you there. The top of a wide occupation is concentrated in particular industries and specializations.

Which occupation has the widest pay spread?

Personal financial advisors, at 7.11 times from $50,190 to $357,020. Chief executives follow at 6.71 times.

What is a typical spread?

About 2.22 times from the tenth to the ninetieth percentile. Under 1.8 is narrow, above 3 is wide.

Does a wide spread mean the job pays well?

No — they are independent. Real estate agents have a wide range and a $52,830 median, which describes a field where a minority does very well.

CS

Charles Slocs

Data and research

Charles Slocs builds the data side of this site — pulling the federal wage and employment series, matching job titles to occupation codes, and working out what the numbers do and do not support. He writes the pages that are mostly a question about evidence: what a survey measured, how wide the spread really is, and which published figure is out of date.

All articles by Charles Slocs →